This is a response to Seven ways PC World is wrong about the iPhone-Android by matchup by tuaw which was a response to 7 Ways Android 2.2 Froyo Tops Apple's iPhone by PC World
In the article, Chris Rawson attempts to knock down Android accomplishments over the iPhone. He first claims that PC World is comparing today's iPhone with the 'as-yet-unbuyable Froyo phones of tomorrow.' Apparently someone is outdated. Froyo has been pushed to the Nexus One handset just days after the Google I / O. Just wanted to make sure we are clear on that.
PC World's take: "Want to use your phone as a broadband modem for your computer? With Android 2.2 you can do it. With the iPhone you can not."
tuaw's take: "Yes, it's true that you can not tether in the US … But what most of these Android evangelism articles are overlooking is that tethering has been possible on the iPhone for almost a year all over the world, except in the US "
OK, so I did the math. While we do not know country breakouts, we do know that Apple shipped 8.7 million phones in their Q1 2010 (ended 12/26/09) and during AT & T's Q4 2009 (ended 12/31/09) they activated 3.1 million, or about 36% of those sold.
America accounts for 36 percent of all iPhone sales. That's a lot for a single country. With America having the highest percentage of iPhone sales, one would believe that it would be catered for. However it is not, and this is where Android shines. Also take into consideration that the Android-iPhone battle is taking place in America. So of course what Android accomplishes in America vs what the iPhone accomplishes in America will matter and will someday determine the all out victor.
2. It turns your phone into a Wi -Fi hotspot
tuaw's take, "Now multiple Macs (or Wi-Fi only iPads) can piggyback off the tethered Mac's connection to the iPhone"
That's always been the problem. Apples close system does not allow for good integration with other systems. If you want to make your Android a hot spot with any Wi-Fi capable device, INCLUDING those pretty little MacBooks, you can. With the way tuaw describes it, it shows that it can only be used Mac to Mac. Even so, that method still cant be used in the US (check my previous response to that).
3. plays Flash
tuaw's take: "Flash support on Android are mixed. Many reviewers have said the playback stutters on even moderately demanding video content, crashes fairly often, and the handset gets" piping hot "and takes a significant hit to battery life after only half an hour of use "
He talks about mixed reports, which means there were bad and there were good. Fair, but in open source, something an iPhone user would never realize, is that we never simply wanted Flash. We wanted the option to use it. So lets say I have a site that is Android Flash compatible and i am an hour or so from home, I want the ability to be able to CHOOSE to use Flash. We still own by just allowing it.
4. has open apps
PC World's take: "On the iPhone you can only download apps that Apple wants to let you download."
tuaw's take: "I can on my iPhone, too. With over 200,000 apps on the App Store, I have yet to run into a situation where I said," I wish there was an app that does (x) "without being able to find one "
Well have you ever wished that you had an app that gives you free turn by turn navigation? Or how about an app that allows free SMS and voice calling through just an internet plan? You probably have not, because then you'd understand that there is not an app for that. Android does not control its users experience. They respect the fact that we paid for the device and therefore should use it how we see fit.
5. It multitasks
tuaw's take: "I guess they've been asleep for the past month, because multitasking is one of the main features of iPhone OS 4.0, very likely due for public release sometime within the next few weeks." It has not happened yet. The fact that Android landed first means Apple is just playing catch up now. Owned.
6. has a better browser
PC World's take: "Android's built-in browser is excellent, but if you do not like it, you can always use another one, such as Opera, and eventually Firefox."
tuaw's take: "PC World's assertion that the only web browsers available for the iPhone are Safari and Opera is also incorrect. There are many alternative browsers available in the App Store other than Opera. True, all of them are based on WebKit like Safari, but that does not mean they do not count "
Umm … yea they do not count. Once a browser, always a browser. However, moving away from that point, Android now has the fastest mobile browser (yes, its faster than the iPad). So Android excels here and your argument lacks authority.
7. It gives you more carrier choice.
Statistically, regarding the war on phones with Android and Apple, its all about controlling the US market because the US market controls the worlds market over time. If a phone is popular here it will be popular there. So for the iPhone to be limited to AT & T, shows that Android still owns in this category. Tuaw's justification is now lacking.
Remember, in a world that does not; Android does. Even if tuaw does not want to accept it.